How do AI agents follow new bioRxiv and medRxiv preprints?

How AI agents follow new bioRxiv and medRxiv preprints

An agent follows preprints by calling a wire that reads the bioRxiv and medRxiv feeds at runtime, filtered with src=biorxiv or src=medrxiv. It returns new biology and medicine manuscripts with titles, dates and links. None of them have been peer reviewed, and an agent must say so.

Preprints are the highest-risk class of source an agent can quote, because they look exactly like published research and carry none of the checks.

Not peer reviewed, and the server says so itself

bioRxiv is direct about what posting does and does not mean. Articles are not peer reviewed, edited or typeset before being posted online. They pass a basic screen for offensive or non-scientific content, material that might pose a health risk, and plagiarism, and that is the whole of it. The server states that no endorsement of an article's methods, assumptions, conclusions or scientific quality is implied by its appearance there.

medRxiv carries the same model for clinical and health research, where the stakes are higher, because a manuscript describing a treatment effect can be read as advice by anyone who does not notice the label.

So the output rule is not optional. An agent citing this wire names the finding, names the server, and states that the work has not been peer reviewed, in the same sentence. Dropping the qualifier turns a draft into a result, which is the failure mode covered more generally in what primary source means for machine-readable data.

The DOI does not pin the version, and that breaks caching

This is the part specific to agents, and it is easy to get wrong.

Authors can submit a revised version at any time before a journal accepts the manuscript. Revised versions retain the same DOI assigned to the first version. To cite a specific version you have to use the version-suffixed URL, of the form .../content/10.1101/2019.12.11.123456v2.

For an agent that stores a claim against a DOI, that means:

• A cached "DOI X reports Y" can become false without the DOI changing. The

authors revised, the numbers moved, and nothing in your stored key registered it.

• The fix is to pin the version URL, not the DOI, whenever the claim is

going to be reused rather than answered once and discarded.

• Posted preprints cannot be removed. They are citable and therefore

permanent, so a withdrawn or superseded claim stays reachable and will keep being retrieved.

There is a further step: bioRxiv usually adds a link to the published journal version within several weeks of publication. Peer review can change conclusions, so the journal version is the one to cite once it exists. An agent that found the preprint in week one and never rechecked is quoting the draft of a paper that has since been corrected.

Querying without drowning

This is a high-volume wire. A live poll returned 60 items inside the retention window, which is the opposite problem from the sparse government sources.

# discovery only, no items: browse every wire, its filters and its price
claude mcp add --transport http botwire https://thebotwire.com/mcp

# paid, $0.005: biology preprints on a specific topic
curl -i "https://thebotwire.com/preprints/latest?src=biorxiv&q=crispr&since=7d&limit=25"

# clinical and health research only
curl -i "https://thebotwire.com/preprints/latest?src=medrxiv&q=vaccine&since=14d"

Parameters are src (biorxiv or medrxiv), q, since and limit (1 to 50). Retention is 14 days with a 7 day default lookback. Search is ranked keyword matching rather than semantic, so gene names, methods and organisms outperform a phrased research question. The call costs $0.005 in USDC on Base with no API key and no signup.

Physics, maths and computer science preprints sit on a different server and a different wire, described in how agents follow new arXiv papers. Full parameters for every route are at /docs.

FAQ

Should an agent ever cite a preprint to a user?

Yes, with the label attached. Preprints are how biology and medicine move first, and refusing to read them means being months behind. What is not acceptable is presenting one as an established finding. Name it as a preprint, give the server and the date, and link the version you actually read.

Can this wire tell me whether a preprint was later published?

No. It reports new postings, not their downstream fate. bioRxiv itself links the published version on the preprint page once a match is made, usually within several weeks of journal publication, so the check is a fetch of the preprint page rather than a query to this wire.

Why does an agent need a wire when both servers publish free feeds?

It does not, if a developer knows in advance that the agent needs preprints and wires both feeds ahead of time. Going direct to the publisher is the right default when the access path allows it. A wire earns its cost when the need appears at runtime, or when one query should span preprints alongside journals, arXiv and public health sources without maintaining four parsers.

How fresh is the preprint wire?

It is polled at most every 15 minutes, which is comfortably inside the posting rhythm of both servers. The observed ingest interval across the service and the last poll timestamp are published live at /health, and that endpoint is the ground truth for any cadence claim on this page.

Sources

The statements that articles are not peer reviewed, edited or typeset before posting, that no endorsement of methods or conclusions is implied, that revised versions retain the DOI of the first version and must be cited by version URL, that posted articles cannot be removed, and that a link to the published journal version is usually added within several weeks, are all published by bioRxiv at about bioRxiv. Poll cadence and per-call pricing for this service are published live at thebotwire.com/health.

Related: How do AI agents follow new arXiv papers? · What does "primary source" mean for machine-readable data?